Author: Vernon Gambetta

Words of Wisdom from Johnny Carson

I saw this quote this morning and it resonated with me. For those of you under 35 Johnny Carson was a masterful comedian and social commentator who had a late night talk show that preceded Leno and Letterman. When I was in college we would watch Johnny Carson’s monologue every night. This quote was so typical of his one liners. I have been thinking a lot lately of the difference between my generation, the so called boomer’s, and the generations that have followed. I am going to post more on this in the context of coaching and teaching. There is a big difference that I can’t quite put my finger on yet. The clinic I attended this past weekend and some interactions that I had in England have made think about this. Meanwhile enjoy the quote. If life was fair, Elvis would be alive and all the impersonators would be dead.- Johnny Carson

De La Salle High School Football

A couple of years ago I picked up a book called One Great Game by Don Wallace, it was about a game about De la Salle High School from Concord California against Long Beach Ploy high school from Long Beach California. The account of the De La Salle program left me amazed and wanted to know more. For those of you that don’t follow it De La Salle owns the record for consecutive wins at 151 games. I also saw them on a nationally televised game against a far superior team and they were amazing with their quickness. A year or two later I found another book on a year with the De La Salle program When the Game Stands Tall by Neil Hayes, a man named Mike Blasquez who was their athletic trainer and conditioning coach figured prominently in the book. This last weekend I met Mike Blasquez who is now the head strength and conditioning coach at University of California Berkeley. We went to dinner and talked for three hours on training. The two things that stuck the me the most about what he did at De La Sale was that the incoming ninth graders spend a year acquiring what I call foundational strength, the ability to handle and control their bodyweight. The second thing was they continued to work two to three days a week in-season and continued to do significant speed development work in-season. It is always fun to meet professionals like this; you bet I am going to watch the Cal programs because with this man’s influence they certainly will be more athletic.

Constantly Learning and Sometimes Amazed

This past weekend I attended a clinic where I learned that something that I have been doing for my 39 years of coaching is wrong! I learned that warm-up is now outdated and that I need to do movement prep instead. I learned that all warm-up does is raise the temperature of the body. Naturally I was taken aback. I am always open to new ideas and I continually challenge myself to learn and improve, but this was a bit much. Let’s get something straight, warm-up is warm-up, movement prep as I see it presented and executed is an implicit part of warm-up. You must warm-up in a systematic, sequential and progressive manner. In fact warm-up may be the most important aspect of the whole workout. It is your bridge from your everyday activities to the mental and physical rigors of the workout. Warm-up does not stand alone; it must match up and dovetail with the objective of the workout, it must be carefully choreographed and sequenced so that it seamlessly flows into the actual workout. Forget movement prep and warm-up, it has worked well for a long time.

The Reset Button

Anyone who has worked with computers quickly realized the importance of the reset button. If we recognize it so quickly with computers why don’t recognize the need with athletes in training? Yes as weird as it may sound each athlete has a reset button. That reset button consists of a training module, a training activity or even a particular workout or recovery method that gets the system back in tune with all cylinders firing. It some respects this is the art the coaching. Learning each athletes reset button requires observation and monitoring of the whole athlete not just a few measureable physical qualities. If you work to find you athletes reset button you can rest assured that your training will be more targeted and productive.

Kelvin Giles Comment on the Female Athlete

Kelvin Giles sent me the following excerpt from one of his manuals after reading the last post on the female athlete: The following information illustrates the differences between the male and female during these ever-changing periods of maturation. It must be pointed out that these are simply differences and in no way should anyone think that this means that we treat the female athlete differently to the male athlete. They can train hard and they can adapt to all the physical, psychological, technical and tactical facets of their chosen sport. They can be exposed to and reach the highest standards in attitude, commitment and discipline. The differences should be viewed as being subtle and should be treated respectfully but not used as an excuse to lower expectations. Without personalising this issue too much I have been honoured to coach several world class female athletes to Olympic and World Championship heights and in each case my approach was no different to that with the male athlete. In each case their mental toughness, discipline, ability to tolerate high intensity work and their total lack of complaint when things got inconvenient and adverse were exemplary. Go to Kelvin’s website http://www.movementdynamics.com for more information. Also read the article on his website about coaching Generation Y, it will make think.

Shoulders of Giants – John Jesse

I just obtained a copy of Wrestling Physical Conditioning Encyclopedia by John Jesse. Paddy Mortimer was gracious enough to send it to me in exchange for an East German book th  at I have that is out is out of print. This book is awesome, full of great practical information. You are probably asking who is John Jesse? John Jesse was an expert on strength training, injury prevention and rehabilitation from Southern California. He went to USC, where he was a contemporary of Peyton Jordan. I think that he worked with Gene Logan of Logan and McKinney Serape Effect fame. I was first exposed to his ideas in an article my high school football coach gave me an article he wrote in 1964. Over the next sixteen years I read everything he wrote that I could get my hands on. Sometime in the late 1970’s, the exact year escapes me, we shared the podium at The Runners World Sponsored National Running Week Symposium. We spoke on Strength Training for Runners. What an honor to share the podium with him. He passed away sometime in the 1980’s and frankly I lost track of his work until the late 90’s when I was going through my library and some files and found a gold mine of his material. I did not realize how much of an influence his ideas had on me. He was preaching tri-plane work in the late 1940’s. Big emphasis on rotary work, a surprise to the gurus of today who think invented rotary work. His training made extensive use of dumbbells, swing bells and body weight movements in addition to traditional lifting movements. If you can obtain any of his books they are well worth reading. His ideas are very contemporary; he was a man ahead of his time. The older I get and the more I coach the more I realize that we are all traveling paths blazed by pioneers like John Jesse. It is almost trite to say that we stand on the shoulders of giants. His work was more the norm rather than the exception in his day. Sound methodology based on good pedagogy grounded in science. We need more John Jesse’s today.

Perpetuating Myths

Last night I read an article that will appear in the New York Times Sunday Magazine on Sunday May 11 called “The Uneven Playing Field” by Michael Sokolove. It is an excerpt from a book called “Warrior Girls: Protecting Our Daughters Against The Injury Epidemic in Women’s Sports.” When I read the article last night I was taken aback. My first reaction was shock, then disgust and then anger. Read this excerpt and I will follow with my thoughts: Girls and boys diverge in their physical abilities as they enter puberty and move through adolescence. Higher levels of testosterone allow boys to add muscle and, even without much effort on their part, get stronger. In turn, they become less flexible. Girls, as their estrogen levels increase, tend to add fat rather than muscle. They must train rigorously to get significantly stronger. The influence of estrogen makes girls’ ligaments lax, and they outperform boys in tests of overall body flexibility — a performance advantage in many sports, but also an injury risk when not accompanied by sufficient muscle to keep joints in stable, safe positions. Girls tend to run differently than boys — in a less-flexed, more-upright posture — which may put them at greater risk when changing directions and landing from jumps. Because of their wider hips, they are more likely to be knock-kneed — yet another suspected risk factor. Sure there are physical differences, but the more we accentuate them the bigger they will be. Today the young female is severely short changed because of the constant stream of information like that presented in this article. Unfortunately this is what the parents, coaches and the girls themselves read and believe. To a certain extent the next paragraph is true: This divergence between the sexes occurs just at the moment when we increasingly ask more of young athletes, especially if they show talent: play longer, play harder, play faster, play for higher stakes. And we ask this of boys and girls equally — unmindful of physical differences. The pressure to concentrate on a “best” sport before even entering middle school — and to play it year-round — is bad for all kids. They wear down the same muscle groups day after day. They have no time to rejuvenate, let alone get stronger. By playing constantly, they multiply their risks and simply give themselves too many opportunities to get hurt. Why am I upset? Because once again we totally miss the point. Don’t set the bar lower because they are girls. Set the same expectation for training as the boys. Girls do respond to training. Come and see the Venice Girls Volleyball team and you will see girls with muscles. They train and work at it year around. They prepare to play, not just play the game and practice the skill. The girls who performed poorly on the Athletic Profile have specific remedial work to do. There are different training groups based on the specific training task that day, one size does not fit all. Sure once past puberty females have a different endocrine hormonal profile than men, that does not mean they do not have the capacity to train and subsequently adapt to that training, it is not a fait accompli that they will get hurt. This whole article overlooks several key factors, not the least of which is the fact that in long term athlete development process the female athlete is victimized by a system that throws them into competition and skill development before they have the physical base of preparation. They over compete and under train and are coached by coaches that have no formal training as coaches and do not understand the needs of the female athlete. The system or lack thereof rewards the more aggressive girls who develop earlier and does not take into account the girl who not as aggressive. In addition there is an incessant search for athletic scholarships that causes the girls to over compete to showcase their talents. There are some simple solutions:          Improve the quality of coaching. Limit the number of competitions a girl can compete in until physical benchmarks are achieved. Institute daily mandatory physical education Kindergarten through twelfth grade. Recognize that the female athlete must strength train year around. All the BS about different landing and running mechanics is just that, pure bull shitake. Poor landing and running mechanics 99% of the time are due to lack of strength, the ability to handle their own bodyweight. You can blame lack of core strength, whatever that is, but it is really a lack of strength throughout the entire kinetic chain. There must be a daily investment in strength training as part of warm-up that includes exercises that are mindful and proprioceptively demanding. Training is a year around proposition, not just something you do six weeks before the start of the season for thirty minutes three times a week. The answer lies in commitment to a consistent athletic development program that encompasses the lifespan of the female athlete. Seven year olds beginning to play should have activities that challenge balance and proprioception coupled with strength oriented movements that require control of body weight in multiple planes. We do not need more articles like this. We need more practical high quality information in the hands of the parents; coach’s and teachers so they can be more aware and better prepare the girls for the rigors of training and competition.

Comings and Going

Congratulation to my friend and colleague Gary Winckler who is retiring as the Head Women’s Track Coach at University of Illinois. Gary will continue to coach his post collegiate athletes and devote more time to work designing and making western saddles. Congratulation to Phil Lundin, another friend and great coach, who is leaving University of Minnesota to take over the Head Track and Field Coaching job at St Olaf College. He is returning to his roots at the Division III level. I know this is something that Phil has contemplated for quite some time, I was glad that he was able to do this. Minnesotas loss is St Olaf’s gain. Dean Benton is leaving the Leicester Tigers to return to the Brisbane Broncos in a new position as Performance Director. These guys are three great people and professionals; I want to wish them all the best in their new endeavors. I hope that each of you along the way in your careers have the opportunity to associate with professionals like this.