Is it just my imagination or are we seeing an increase of hip labral tears? Is this another case of more sophisticated diagnostic techniques finding something that was always there? I know this was a big topic at a sports medicine conference I spoke at last year. The surgeons were all discussing arthroscopic procedures used for the surgery. I just have to be a bit skeptical. I would appreciated any comments; perhaps I am missing something here. It just reminds of the time our team physician with the White Sox had gone to a conference and heard a talk on slap lesions in the shoulder. In spring training physical with the minor leaguers he started look for slap lesions. Guest what, he started finding them.
I was sent an article written by Ken Mannie, Strength and Conditioning coach at Michigan State entitled Traditional vs. Functional: Balancing the Scales. What is the difference between traditional training and functional training or traditional strength training and functional strength training? Is there a difference? What scales are we trying to balance? Let start with a definition – Functional training incorporates a full spectrum of training methods, designed to elicit optimum adaptive response appropriate for the sport or activity being trained for. It is not a choice between traditional and functional, nor is it a balance. For some reason people love to categorize and pigeonhole ideas and concepts to either justify of refute certain ideas. All training is functional; it is just a matter of how functional in relation to preparation for the sport or activity trained for. There are very simple steps to follow 1) Determine the demands of the sport you are preparing for 2) Determine the demands of the position or event in the sport 3) Determine the qualities of the individual athlete 4) Address injury prevention by understanding the pattern of injuries that occur in that sport. Using this simple algorithm as a starting point not much is left to chance. Then apply these criteria to your strength training in selecting the exercises and movements: 1) Multiple joint, 2) multiple plane, 3) proprioceptively demanding. Then make sure that within a seven day training cycle that you have a distribution of pulling, pushing, squatting (and squat derivatives) and rotational movements. All training is based on principles, if those basic principles are observed the mode of strength training can be adapted to prepare the athletes for the demands of the sport. If you have to move someone or move a heavy object then heavier external resistance is necessary and you must add mass. (Photo at left is a quarterback, if he were an offensive lineman then the movement would probably be with a bar and significantly heavier) A program like that should look and feel different from a program for volleyball or baseball. Mannie suggest that “functional movements” have a place as fillers during a workout or finishers to end a workout. As far as I am concerned that shows a lack of understanding of the big picture of training. I want my athletes to focus; good training does not have “fillers” or “enders.” Each exercise has a specific goal and purpose to prepare the athlete for competition. You must carefully choose the exercises, the sequence and order. Each workout has a specific theme that fits into the theme of the week. I want the athlete to connect the movements in the strength training to their performance on the field, court or the pool. This makes it mindful with the athlete fully engaged in the process. I have seen this work in all sports including American football. Perhaps the best example of this approach was the training of the Brisbane Broncos Rugby League team. I observed their training for two weeks. It met all the criteria I outline while lifting heavy and moving fast. (Photo at right is a Bronco player working on strengthening a spefic movment he needs to work on) Their strength coach Dan Baker and their performance director Dean Benton get it. I know football programs that are using this approach with outstanding success. It demands a tremendous amount of planning and supervision, but what good training program does not? There are amny roads to Rome, some are more direct than others.
It has really bothered me to see the press about the Santa Barbara fire focusing on the celebrities. Many people who are not celebrities lost their homes and all their possessions. This is a great article that puts the fire, sport and winning in perspective http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-plaschke18-2008nov18,0,5737203.column
This is reprinted from the New York Times Sports page. A friend of mine called my attention to this. His coach Bob Kiphuth at Yale was a pioneer in the application of dryland training to swimming. It is interesting to note in the article that they could not put the long hours in the pool because they did not have goggles and the pools were heavily cholrinated. Alan Ford, Top Freestyler in 1940s, Is Dead at 84 By BRUCE WEBER Published: November 16, 2008 Thirty-six years before Michael Phelps, in a Beijing swimming pool, became the standard-bearer for how fast a human being could move through the water, there was Mark Spitz at the Olympics in Munich. And decades before Spitz, there was Johnny Weissmuller, a k a Tarzan, who in the 1920s set dozens of world marks, including 51 seconds in the 100-yard freestyle, a record that stood for 16 years. Alan Ford won the silver medal in the 100-meter freestyle at the 1948 London Olympics. The man who broke it was Alan Ford, a 19-year-old Yale student. He bettered his record three more times in the next 13 months, until he became the first swimmer to break 50 seconds for 100 yards, a barrier that some likened to the four-minute mile. No one else accomplished the feat for another eight years. Ford became known as the human fish, an unofficial title he took over from Weissmuller. He was, simply put, the fastest swimmer in the world. He died Nov. 3 at age 84 in Sarasota, Fla., where he lived. The cause was emphysema, his son Robert said, a result of a smoking habit that began in the Navy after Ford graduated from Yale. Ford was an unusual champion. At 5 feet 9 inches and a muscular 170 pounds, he was far smaller than Weissmuller. Unlike Spitz and Phelps, he was built more like a bullet than a beanpole. Under the tutelage of the legendary Yale coach Bob Kiphuth, who emphasized muscle building and dry-land training — this was before the advent of goggles, when swimmers were restricted to about 90 minutes a day in a chlorine-treated pool — Ford became a physical specimen. In a series of photographs in Life magazine, he was shown demonstrating his freestyle stroke, and displaying his physique, lying face down on a table in his swim trunks. “He had the perfect body for swimming,” Phil Moriarty, one of Ford’s coaches at Yale, said in a telephone interview on Friday. “He was slim in the areas where he had to be slim, and he was strong. Swimmers were like that back then; they weren’t tall people, but they were strong.” Alan Robert Ford was born on Dec. 7, 1923, in what was then the Panama Canal Zone, where his grandfather had moved the family 16 years earlier to work on the construction of the canal. When he was 8, Ford won a swimming medal that was presented by a visiting celebrity, Weissmuller. At the suggestion of a swimming coach, Alan’s father sent the boy to high school back in the States, at Mercersburg Academy in Pennsylvania, which had a strong swimming program. Then he spent two and a half years at Yale, graduating with a mechanical engineering degree in a program that had been accelerated because of the war. The war also caused the cancellation of the 1944 Summer Olympics, costing Ford his best chance at a gold medal. That year he won national collegiate championships in the 50- and 100-yard freestyle events and the 150 backstroke. When Ford left the Navy, he and his wife, Beverly, moved back to New Haven so that he could train with Kiphuth for the 1948 Summer Olympics in London. He had lost 20 to 25 pounds of muscle since leaving Yale and had not been in a pool in almost three years. But after six months of training, he made the United States Olympic team and won a silver medal in the 100-meter freestyle. (His wife prevailed upon him to quit smoking for the duration of his training. “But he told me he couldn’t wait to get back to it,” she said.) Ford spent his professional life as an industrial engineer, designing and supervising the construction of oil refineries, chemical storage facilities and other buildings. In the meantime, the swimming records that had made him famous became obscure. Since the 1950s, world records have been kept only for distances measured in meters, and training methods and rules have evolved to such an extent that racing times have been significantly lowered. (The unofficial record for the 100-yard freestyle, currently held by Cesar Cielho Filho of Brazil, is 40.92 seconds, nearly eight and a half seconds better than Ford’s best time, 49.4.) Ford was inducted into the International Swimming Hall of Fame in 1966. In addition to his wife and his son Robert, of Syracuse, Ford is survived by a sister, Marilyn Foster, of Manhattan; two other sons, Donald, of San Francisco, and Randy, of Lexington, Ky.; a daughter, Joy Recla, of Jacksonville, Fla.; seven grandchildren; and six great-grandchildren. “He was very modest for someone who had already been in Life magazine,” Beverly Ford said on Friday, recalling their first date. “He did not like pomposity or self-importance.” Which perhaps explains the irritation he always felt about Weissmuller. “He never wrote me to congratulate me or made an effort to meet me,” Ford said in an interview last year with Bruce Wigo, the chief executive of the International Swimming Hall of Fame. “The only time I spoke to him since meeting him in the Canal Zone when I was a kid was when I was inducted in 1966. When I was introduced, someone let out a loud ‘Boo!’ It was Weissmuller. Everyone laughed when they saw who it was. But I’m not sure he was joking.”
Pete Newel passed away this week. I never got to hear him speak or to meet him. He was on my list. I remember listening to John Bach, the assistant coach with the Bulls at the time speak about Newel. He spoke about Newel and his ideas about basketball almost with reverence. He was a guy big on fundamentals. I think the following quote sums up the base of Pete Newels philosophy: “We have an adage at camp,” he said in one of several telephone interviews we did. “The quality of your shot will depend on the quality of your footwork.” John Bach also told me that newel had his players at Cal practice shooting with medicine balls to increase their range.
Last Wednesday I had the pleasure of attending the Air Force Academy football practice and subsequent strength training session at the invitation of Matt McGettigan, head Football Strength & Conditioning coach. It was an amazing show. If you want to talk about getting a lot done in short period of time, in short efficiency that is what I saw. Not a minute wasted. This scheduled is dictated by the academy schedule, so it forces everyone to have a laser like focus on the absolute need to do. Some of the players lifted before practice, I was not able to observe that session, another group lifted after. After a brief specific warm-up the focus was on three lifts with active remedial exercises between lifts. There was not a minute wasted. At the conclusion of that session the players did a static stretch and used the foam rollers. The players who did the lift before practice came through and did the same cooldown. Matt has no full time help. Jack Braley, the retired Strength & Conditioning coach comes and helps Matt. It was great to see Jack again, still active and helping Matt coach at age 74. He is a real pioneer in this field. He started coaching at the AFA in 1965 as an assistant football coach and became the strength and conditioning coach in 1980. It was fun trading stories and reminiscing about the good old days. Anytime you get spend time around professionals like jack and Matt it reaffirms my faith that we are on the right track. I certainly picked up some pointers and ideas I will use in my programs.
I was saddened to learn of the passing of Harmon Brown. Harmon was a real pioneer in both sports medicine and sports science. He was very instrumental in my career. I found it almost ironic that I learned of his passing when I checked my email during a break at a conference at the US Olympic Training center in Colorado spring, a site where Harmon lead so many organizational meeting to get sports medicine and sport science as integral part of the US Olympic development process. He gave me an opportunity to be the women’s hurdle coordinator which in turn gave me the opportunity to be involved in the sports science work leading into the 1984 Olympics. What many people did not realize was that Harmon was a great throwing coach. When I was coaching at Cal he coached the throwers at Cal State Hayward. He was always so willing to share his knowledge with my throwers, something we all appreciated. Harmon was also very instrumental in the success of the coaching education program. When the program started there was much opposition from the old AAU group, but Harmon in his role a committee chair lent his support. Even more important he lead by example, he was one of the first name coaches to go through the Level One curriculum. I remember teaching that school with him in the audience. What a powerful message that sent to everyone in the room and those who had been critical of the program. I will miss Harmon. I did not communicate as often with him in the last few years, but when I did he always inspired to keep learning. He will be missed as a great person and a quiet leader. I hope someone in the sport of Track & Field can fill the void that Harmon has left.
What a story. Entering the MLS playoff as the eight and last seed the Red Bull fought their way to the Western Conference Championship last night night defeating Real Salt Lake 1 – 0. They got there by defeating the Houston Dynamo, the two time defending MLS champions. I am so happy for Juan Osorio, the coach of the Red Bull. He is a great coach, a dear friend and a wonderful person. It has been so great to see his growth as a coach over the years. In all my years of coaching I can’t think of anyone more focused, dedicated and passionate than Juan. He told me when I first met him 11 years ago that he would be the manger of a first division pro team. He said that not with cockiness, but determination. At the time he was coaching a semi pro team that played in central park on Sundays. He came to this country from Columbia without any knowledge of English. He memorized words out of the dictionary to learn the language. He graduated from college and eventually from John Moores University in England Science of Football program. They play next Sunday for the MLS Cup against the Columbus Crew. They are prohibitive underdogs but don’t count out the Red Bull, Juan will have them ready and find a way to give them a chance to win.