Author: Vernon Gambetta

Evolution of Strength Training – My Personal Journey – Part One

When I began weight training in summer of 1963, it was not commonly accepted as a method of training, in fact weight training was discouraged. There were concerns about becoming “muscle bound,” that it would slow you down, or it would interfere with you coordination. It was considered acceptable to do hard manual labor to develop muscle and extensive calisthenics, but weight training was frowned upon. With all these thoughts in mind we had a guest speaker come to my high school to speak to all the athletes. The speaker was Lynn Hoyem, a backup center for the Dallas Cowboys, who spoke to us about the benefits of weight training. He had gained 50 pounds of lean mass through weight training. He gave us advice as to how to start a program, explained some of the basic physiology of muscle growth and strength gain. He offered tips on how to gain weight, as most of us were football players who were trying to gain weight. It was a very impressive presentation that was very different from we were being told at the time. I knew that if I were going to have any chance of playing college football, my sport of choice at the time, I would have to get stronger and bigger so I began a journey that continues today. Today at age 64 I still strength train at least three days a week, obviously for a different purpose than in 1963. Now it is to off set the effects of aging but also to keep experimenting with new methods and ideas to learn in order to make my athletes better. At that time there was not very much information on weight training. Before I started on a I felt I needed to find out more information, because my coaches were very wary of weight training. My best friend and I went to the local university library and checked out every book they had on weight training. The three books that I found most helpful were “Weight Training In Athletics And Physical Education” by Gene Hooks, who was the baseball coach at Wake Forest University, “Better Athletes Through Weight Training” by Bob Hoffman, who was the owner of York barbell company and a pioneer in weight training “Weight Training in Athletics” by Murray and Karpovich. The books were very good and gave us the information we needed as to selection of exercises, set, reps, and overall construction of weight training program as well as reinforcing that weight training would help us be better athletes. In addition Strength and Health magazine, published by Bob Hoffman of York Barbell, proved to be a good source, because it contained high level information on all aspects of strength training, including tips on good nutrition. (In fact in looking back through my files while doing research for this article I found articles from Strength & Health on periodization which people would consider good information today) The information was very good; in fact it was cutting edge, with the latest training ideas from the eastern bloc countries and features on top athletes who made use of weight training in their training programs. It was very informative and motivational, because they were working hard to break down the myths surrounding weight training. After gathering as much information as I could, building some basic equipment and purchasing a barbell set my friend and I started on a program. When I began weight training I weighed about 163 pounds. I was so tight I could not touch my toes. I could barely do a pull-up and could only do 20 pushups, not very good by any standard of measurement. Still people were cautioning me that weight training would make me tight and slow. After four months of a program I had gained 15 pounds. I could touch my toes, in fact I could put my palms flat on the ground. I now could do ten pull-ups and fifty pushups and was noticeably faster. I could also now also put my hand over the rim in basketball, where before I had been barely able to touch the rim. Naturally I was questioning the myths. In fact everything that the coaches and a lot of experts was saying was just the opposite of what had happened. I gained muscle, got more explosive, more flexible and faster. I realized that I was onto something and I needed to find out more. Thus began a magical mystery tour of trying out new training methods and ideas, which continues today. Following conventional wisdom of the time there was no thought of weight training in season. Since I participated in three sports the only time available to lift was after track ended in the spring until the start of football practice in September. The next off-season, which was before my freshman year in college, I was able to gain another twenty pounds and increase my explosiveness significantly. I realize now in retrospect that some of this was normal growth and development coupled with the hard work. We know now that directed work during a growth spurt when the body is secreting anabolic hormones like crazy is an optimum time to make gains. This is a clear message to all those high school age athletes who are seeking the magic bullet of supplementation. A good sound diet coupled with a well-designed training program during a growth spurt will yield spectacular results. After my freshman football season at Fresno State College there was no formal off-season conditioning program. We were instructed to be in shape for spring practice. We were on our own. We had one of the first Universal Gym multi station weight machines and a few free weights. Naturally since the machine was convienent and easy that is what I used. I found immediately that my “strength” increased rapidly. In fact I remember remarking to a friend that I can lift a lot more because I do not have to balance and control the weight. I quickly gained more muscle bulk, but now instead of feeling more explosive I felt bulky and slower, but I thought that was OK because everyone else was doing it. The first day of spring practice I pulled a hamstring, my first experience with anything like that. In retrospect it had a lot to do with the type of lifting I was doing, of course I did not relate the two at the time. In setting out to design my program in preparation for my sophomore year I realized that I needed to get off the machines and do more work with free weights if I was going to develop the strength necessary to be a better football player. I heard of a man named Alvin Roy who originally had worked with a Istrouma high school in Louisiana and then with the LSU football program when they won the national championship in 1958. He had worked with Billy Cannon, the Heisman trophy winner and Jim Taylor who went on to star with the Green Bay Packers, both of whom were fast, explosive and agile. The things that I read that he was doing made a lot of sense. Through my high school football coach I found out that he was now with the San Diego Chargers, as their strength coach (The first in professional football). He and Sid Gillman, Coach of the Chargers, had a book on their training program – World Champion San Diego Chargers Strength Program – In and Out of season – that my high school coach lent to me. I followed the programs down to the letter. It was a varied program that involved squatting, Olympic lifting movements, as well as functional isometric contractions. I saw significant improvement in terms of speed and explosiveness. The drawback was that I struggled to gain weight on the Charger program. Looking back it was just too much work for my maturity level and training (A concept I had no idea of at the time). Also it was later revealed that the Charger players had free access to anabolic steroid’s (They were not banned then and were legal), which greatly enhanced their work capacity. There were no days of rest or recovery built into the program. At the time I thought was OK because I was into work, but I now realize was a big mistake, because I was always sore. The lesson I learned here is that it is not advisable to blindly copy someone else’s program unless you know all the factors and ingredients of the program. Through articles in Strength and Health and watching the track team at Fresno State weight train it was clear that the sport of track & field was very advanced in the use of weight training and it application. Herb Elliot, who dominated the mile up through the Rome Olympics, and his coach Percy Cerruty made extensive use of strength training. Perry OBrien, the first man to throw sixty feet in the shot put was an avid weight trainer. He was fast enough to lead off a sprint relay, so it obviously did slow him down! Dallas Long, the first man to throw over sixty five feet and Randy Matson, the first man to throw over seventy feet were all avid weight trainers. Lynn Davies, the 1964 Olympic Long Jump champion, was able to significantly improve his speed. Russ Hodge, who broke the world record in the decathlon in the early sixties, made extensive use of weight training in his program. Chuck Coker, the coach at Occidental College in Los Angeles was a pioneer in the implementation of weight training in Track & Field with his athletes. The results of these athletes spoke for the efficacy of weight training. I tried to find out everything those people did and built it into my program. In college it was the track team, especially the field event people under the direction of Coach Red Estes who extensively used strength training, not the football team. Larry Alexander was a high jumper on the track team had thoroughly studied the Russian high jump training methods used by Valeri Brummel, who was the world record holder at the time. Larry was kind enough to share his ideas with me. Brummel’s program made extensive use of a variety of strength training exercises and jumping exercises that we would latter call plyometrics. Larry also introduced me Track Technique magazine, a magazine devoted to presenting the latest training methods in track & field. These articles laid out a systematic approach as well as reasons for the drills and exercises. I still find the information published in the early to mid sixties as timely today as it was then. It is no wonder that I found that when I worked out with the track athletes I got my best results from my strength training program. The basic problem with all the programs that I used throughout college was that there was never any recovery. We went heavy on legs as often as three times a week, in addition to running every day, which never allowed our legs to recover. I thought a sore back and dead legs were just a normal part of the training. Fortunately or unfortunately depending on how you look at it, we did not try to lift in season or during spring practice, which actually served as a break. The problem with no workouts in season is that every off-season I was essentially starting over again each off season. I questioned this because I saw the track athletes lifting throughout their season with no ill effects. In fact the shot putter’s would often lift the day of the meet. Little did I realize that this was a portent of things to come.

Proprioception

Ultimately the glue that binds a whole training program together is proprioception. I think of proprioception as the ability that lends quality to the movement. Proprioception is awareness of joint position derived from feedback in the sense receptors in the joints, ligaments, tendons, and muscles. It is a highly trainable quality that we tend to take for granted. It is almost too simple. Perhaps to appreciate proprioception we should look at the extreme case of a stroke victim that is able to return to normal movement patterns. Why can’t an athlete who has all their capacities enhance the quality of their movement by focusing on the same things that the stroke victim has to focus on to get back to function. The key to that is proprioception. We must strive to constantly change proprioceptive demand throughout the training program in order to enhance the quality of movement.

Grunt Work

  90% of what we do in coaching is grunt work. The daily grind is just that, a grind, endless mundane tasks that must be attended to. If you are like me you live for the Saturday meet and the training sessions with the athletes, but that is such a small part of the picture. Sure that is the highlight, the culmination but without the grunt work the athlete or team would not be ready for the competition or even for the training session. Grunt work consists of the little things. The administrative paper shuffling  that comes with the territory. It means getting to the pool early and moving the lane lines to switch from the pool from long course to short course. It is digging up the long jump pit. It is drying out the throwing circles. It is setting up the weight room for the workout. It is talking to that parent who knows more than you do about training. It is properly filling out the entries for the meet and checking eligibility forms. It is dealing with the press. It is fundraising, making travel arrangements and on and on. We do all that so that we can have that precious two hours with the athletes to help guide them to their destinations. Our task as coaches is to keep the focus on the two hours we are with the athletes and recognize that how we do the grunt work will enable us to have the highest quality time with our athletes. Nobody likes it but we must do it and do it well. The competition and the training is the icing on the cake.

The Gambetta Method – Systematic Athletic Development Principle Two

Principle Two – Dynamic postural alignment and dynamic balance are the foundation for all training Posture and balance are threads that are woven through the cloth of training. They are always there in some way, shape or form. Posture is a dynamic quality; it is not static! It is certainly not a posed still position. Posture is highly individual to each person’s body structure and highly adapted to the sport activity the athlete is engaged in. The actual work to improve posture is quite transparent, it is an integral part of the overall training program. Remember we are training to move, not to stand still. Balance is inherent in quality movement. It is closely linked to posture(s). It is a dynamic controlling quality. Look for every opportunity to train balance in motion not in stillness. After all movement occurs off of one foot onto the other. In efficient movement there is constant positioning and repositioning the center of gravity over the base of support. Movement is an endless process of losing and regaining balance while moving through a variety of postures. Traditionally both posture and balance have been thought of as isolated static qualities. Posture as rigid, statuesque as referenced to a posture grid. For balance a posed single leg static stance was considered the norm. Nothing could be further from the reality of movement. The interplay between posture and balance is an interpretive dance consisting of varied tempos dictated by the chaotic demands of the skill. The body is constantly reorganizing, adjusting and readjusting to the demands of gravity and ground reaction forces to achieve optimum alignment in order to efficiently reduce and produce force in all planes of motion. This demands that posture and balance are trained in an environment that is  almost dancelike with a wide range of rhythms and tempos. I think of Tai Chi on one end of the continuum and the Brazilian martial art Capoeira on the other end of the spectrum. Tai Chi is deliberate and flowing contrasted to Capoeira that is almost frenetic and explosive with compromising the rhythm. Both require dynamic balance and control of varied postures. Hopefully this helps you to understand why I place posture and balance as the second principle. In many ways they are unifying element that enables the other athletic qualities to be expressed to their fullest extent. They are always there, use them and enhance them through training. It is best to heed the sage of advice of Mr. Miyagi in Karate Kid “Better  learn balance. Balance is key. Balance good, karate good. Everything good. Balance bad, better pack up, go home. Understand?”

Injury Prevention

Every sound training program should incorporate an injury prevention component. It has been my experience that the best “injury prevention” programs are almost completely transparent. If the training program is well designed to meet the demands of the sport and takes into account the qualities of the individual athlete then you should see no difference between injury prevention and performance enhancement. Another way to put it is that many of the exercises and drills serve a dual purpose. I have always used the warm-up as my main injury prevention period, do I call it that, absolutely not! It is carefully sequenced to prepare the body for the workout. Each segment of the training or practice session should incorporate lead up drills or sequences that serve a dual purpose. In the event that the athlete has a history of a particular injury then I will design a special module that that athlete either does pre-practice or latter on their own Mind you that the routine is thoroughly taught and it is individualized for that athlete. No matter what is done to prevent them, injuries will occur. If you train hard and compete hard you will be on the edge. It is our job to minimize injuries to the best extent possible. The best way to that is by having a system that addresses injury prevention as part of the big picture. I have found that a focus on injury prevention often has the opposite effect. Everyone becomes so fixated on injuries that they are tip toeing around walking on egg shells and the athletes are more susceptible to injury. Focus on performance enhancement with the injury prevention element carefully blended so that it is transparent.

Coach What Happens

So often we get caught up in coaching something we think happens rather what actually happens. In today’s world there is no excuse for this. We have sophisticated game analysis information and biomechanical analysis to break down individual skill so that we know exactly what happens. It is important to recognize that each individual has a style that is his or her expression (interpretation if you will) of technique. If you look closely at these individuals that look different you will see that at the moment of truth they will be in a position to optimally reduce or produce the appropriate force to complete the intended task. Coach that individual and what they absolutely need to do to be successful. Don’t try to get them to be something they are not. Know what happens and coach that.

Twitter Coaching

I must admit when I first heard about Twitter I thought it was frivolous. My thought was how dumb, what could you possibly say in 162 characters? Now I get it. Get to the point, be precise and concise and get the message across. The same holds true for coaching. Start your workout with a brief clear message that clearly outlines the theme and the objectives of the workout. During the workout make you instructions and corrections short; phrases are better than sentences and sentences preferable to paragraphs.  Use action words that elicit the action you want to see. Coaching is teaching and teaching is communication. Get to the point. Remember it is not what you say it what the athletes hears so make the message clear. Be like John Wodden. (There are only 262 words in the Gettysburg address!)

Stop and Think!

What exactly are you doing in your training? When are you doing it? How are you doing it? Why are you doing it? Who are you doing it with? Is the training mindful and meaningful or is it just a collections of task the athletes need to get done in order to end the workout? Do the training tasks connect to the competetive demands of the sport? Are you coaching them or just keep them occupied and entertained? Is it a partnership with your athletes or a dictatorship? Are you athletes getting better because of or in spite of the training? Does the training journey have a clear vision of the competitive destination and a well-defined path with road signs to provide direction toward that destination?