Coaching Athletic Development for Swimming From Design to Implementation The GAIN swimming network is part of the GAIN network whose goal is to provide an experience that will significantly enhance participant’s expertise by sharing information with other professionals in a setting that encourages an open exchange of ideas. GAIN Swimming follows a workshop format consisting of lecture, discussions, hot topic panels, team spotlight presentations, practical learn by doing participation and demonstration. If you are sincerely interested in advancing your professional development as a swim coach apply now. Mission Statement To instill a culture of daily physical preparation that grows & nurtures adaptable swimming athletes who understand the wisdom of their bodies, its ability to self-organize and solve movement problems. Goal At the end of the journey all physical limitations are eradicated and the swimmer is ready technically, tactically, physically and psychologically to compete to win. What is Dryland training? It is more than just another workload that you impose on your swimmers. It must be highly correlated with the objectives of the water workout to achieve optimum results. Dates & Site September 8-10, 2017: Carmel Swim Club, Carmel, Indiana Benefits Access to GAIN Swimming Forum on secure web site Access to the GAIN Swim library including videos of past GAIN Swim Conferences Cost of Attendance In Network – (Those that are currently using GAIN swimming services) $750 for three coaches, $100 for each additional coach Individual – $750 Outside Network - $1500 for three coaches plus $100 for each additional coach Location Carmel Swim Club, Carmel Indiana To Register https://www.teamunify.com/MemRegStart.jsp?team=incsc&event_id=791825 Deadline for registration is September 1 For Further Information Please contact Vern Gambetta at gstscoach@gmail.com, Chris Plumb at cplumb@carmelswimclub.org or Ian Murray at imurray@carmelswimclub.org You can also contact the Carmel Swim Club directly at 317-575-8244. The Faculty Our faculty is experienced professionals who have been in the trenches working in the field of athletic development for swimming. Vern Gambetta – Founder of GAIN Network, pioneer in dryland training for swimming Chris Plumb – Chris Plumb is the Head Coach/CEO of Carmel Swim Club. Ian Murray – Associate Head Coach of Carmel Swim Club Chris Webb – Head Coach, T2 Aquatics in Naples Florida Tentative Schedule Friday September 8 Registration – 3:00 to 4:00 PM Opening Session – 4:00 to 7:00 Saturday September 9 Early Morning – Observation of Carmel Dryland – 6:00 to 8:00 Breakfast – 8:00 to 9:30 Morning Session – 9:30 to 12:00 Lunch – 12:00 to 1:30 Afternoon Session – 1:30 to 5:30 Evening Dinner & Social (No Host) Sunday September 10 Morning Session – 8:30 to 1:00
It’s championship season in Track & Field. This is what everyone has been preparing for all year. Are your athletes ready? Rest assured at this time of year there is always doubt. Have I done enough? Have I done too little? The bottom line is that you must trust your preparation and assure your athletes that their preparation has been what they need. There is nothing you can do now to make them better. If you have the urge to do something different – DON’T. If you have the urge to do one more hard workout – DON’T. Fine tune and keep reminding yourself that at this stage of the season what you don’t do is more important than what you actually do. Get them feeling like a caged lion coming out of the gate. Always remember the advice of the old cowboy: “Always dance the last dance with who brung you to the dance.”
There is a stampede toward evidence based practice in medicine and sport science, but as I take a step back and look at this I have some very profound concerns. The biggest concern is what if the evidence is flawed? I encourage you to read this article (John P. A. Ioannidis Why Most Published Research Findings Are False https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1182327/ the most downloaded technical paper from the journal PLoS Medicine) and think very critically and in depth before you jump into applying something that is “evidence based” just because it has statistical significance or the proper P value. You may also want to read: Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002049 The bottom line here is to be an informed skeptic and find the balance between evidence based practice and practice based evidence.
You know John Wooden, you know Geno Auriemma at UConn or the late Pat Summit but how about Jim Steen? While the coach at Kenyon College the men’s team won twenty-nine consecutive National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division III championship titles while the women’s teams won twenty-one. That record of fifty titles surpasses those of any other coaches in any NCAA sport. I had the privilege of working with Jim’s teams for two of the championships, but even better than that every spring Jim comes to Sarasota with his family and we get together for lunch. His passion and energy and wisdom are so contagious it always gets me charged up. As an aside I have NEVER heard Jim talk about mental toughness! This is Jim’s 2011 commencement address at Keyon College: Do you have the imagination to see yourself doing something truly exceptional? Coaching Session We're ready for our coaching session. This is a little larger team than I am used to, but let's give it a shot. I'm not going to ask you get up and move around or stand up and cheer. This session is definitely not interactive. Like generations of Kenyon swimmers, all you have to do is sit there and take it! Decide for yourself if anything makes sense or if you have a better way of looking at things. I have three coaching points I want to make with you today, and they all relate to one's capacity to perform. Before I begin, however, allow me the one convention of this business that I fully embrace, for reasons that aren't necessarily related to sports. (Steen replaces academic cap with baseball cap). OK, thanks. I'm ready to go! Attitude So, how's your attitude? Probably pretty good today. What's not to be good? You've successfully made it from point A to point B and tomorrow you'll have all the necessary credentials to prove it! What's your attitude going to be like on Monday? Or next month? Or next fall? I'm sure some of you have jobs lined up, many of you are off to graduate school, a few of you will be traveling, and still others are uncertain about what you're going to be doing in the next few weeks, let alone the next few years. From my point of view that's OK, because regardless of what you're doing next week or next year, things will change and, in some cases, things will change dramatically. What's most important in this whole process, however, is attitude. Back in the mid-90s I had a big, strapping sprinter on my team, with a big booming voice, who won a couple of NCAA titles in the 50-yard freestyle. Fortunately, everybody on the team liked this guy, because when anyone was having a difficult practice, or a bad meet, or an awful day in class, or a problem with coach, his comment was always the same, "Hey, man, it's all about attitude!" No doubt, an individual of lesser stature offering the same admonition over and over again would have been persecuted! Even though this guy wasn't the hardest worker on the team, or the most talented, no one ever doubted the direction he was going. And that's what's important to remember about attitude. It's not whether it's good or bad, but does it define your direction? If the best path in getting from point A to point B is due north, I've had very few individuals on my team who have made the serious choice to head south! People usually fall short because they're a degree or two off in attitude and, over time and distance that can put you in a place far away from where you would like to be. You may have honestly assessed what constitutes a journey in the right direction, but if you're not performing the way you want to perform don't look at what you're doing, look at your attitude. On my team, when I challenge someone's attitude—and I love doing that—it's not an attack on their character. It's a belief in their ability to get back on course. What you have made of your life today is a result of the attitude you established for yourself when you came to this place in the fall of 2007. Your life in the future will be the result of the attitude you set for yourself when you leave this hallowed ground. If you're fortunate to have people in your life like you've had here at Kenyon—people you trust, people who know and appreciate you well enough to look you in the eye and remind you that you can do better, listen to them and make the necessary adjustment in your attitude. The worst position to be in is not slightly off course, and it's doubtful that any of you are deliberately going to head due south. The worst position to be in is a belief by you, or those around you, that you couldn't possibly do any better than you're currently doing! Imagination We've pretty much redefined attitude as it relates to performance. Let's take a look at your capacity to prepare. How is your work ethic? Is it helping you or hurting you in your capacity to perform? During your time on the Hill did you give it your best? Or did you avoid putting in the time and effort necessary to fully take advantage of your opportunities? Regardless of how you performed at Kenyon, we can all agree—whether we subscribe to the 10,000-hour rule or not—that a sustained period of focused attention and applied effort is absolutely essential in getting better at anything that really matters. And, yet, hard work, in my experience, is not the sole determinant of one's capacity to achieve. In fact, one's sense of what can be accomplished in any endeavor—what is truly possible—is often compromised by too much hard work and too little imagination. All work and no play may make Jack a dull boy, but all work and no imagination will most definitely make Jack an under-performer. Of this I'm absolutely convinced! It's been my experience that the hardest workers are not always the most prolific performers. The correlation between grinding it out, day in and day out, and the capacity to perform at transcendent levels does not always appear to be direct. In discussing this with my fellow coaches on the faculty over the years, I've picked up on similar sentiments. The student who puts in the work is not always the student who is the most creative and engaged in their thinking. If you have a limited imagination—a limited concept of what's possible—then performing in a truly exceptional manner at any level, in any arena, is improbable at best, irrelevant at worst. You may have the talent to excel. You may have the intelligence to excel. You may have the work ethic and competitiveness to excel. But the real question is: do you have the imagination and creativity to continuously 'reframe' your reality so it is consistent with your highest aspirations? Imagination fuels perspective and perspective puts one in touch with the bigger picture. The bigger picture, in turn, allows for more possibilities and more ideas. Performing at one's best begins with the creation and expression of an idea—nothing more, nothing less. Do you have the imagination to see yourself doing something truly exceptional? Certainly it's difficult to sustain a leap of the imagination that isn't, in part, grounded in the knowledge and appreciation of one's inherent abilities. But it's been my experience that people greatly under value their capacity to perform and, as a result, their capacity to achieve. Imagination can be improved. Committing the best of yourself to any worthwhile endeavor requires that you do so. By attaching your efforts to whatever it is you choose to do in a way that stimulates your imagination, you enhance your capacity to perform at any level. To quote no less a 'performer' than Albert Einstein on this subject, "Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere." Threats vs. Challenges My final coaching point of the day: It's my contention that in any given moment one lives one's life in one of two ways, either under a threat or for a challenge. In performing when it counts, it's one or the other, under a threat or for a challenge. If, as Einstein says, "Imagination will take you everywhere," then living your life under a threat will take you nowhere. Perceived threats, often resulting in fear, invariably compromise our capacity to perform in the manner we most desire. And there are all sorts of perceived threats that ultimately reduce us in stature, making us feel small, insignificant, and powerless. There is the threat of failure. The threat of not measuring up. The threat of pain. The threat of humiliation. The threat of illness or injury. The threat of not being appreciated or valued. The threat of being exposed for who we are. The threat of not being understood. And the list goes on and on. It's so easy to live one's life threatened by the outcome we fear that we deaden our senses to the process, content to merely occupy time and space, satisfied with a half-life of sorts. We go through the motions, occasionally wake up, look for our shadow, and quickly scurry back into our den of predictability. Sound familiar? And yet it is possible to reframe our threats into challenges and get a much better return on our performance investment with little more time and effort involved. In doing so, you first have to wake up. You have to be among the living! A conscious decision needs to be made that you're not going to allow the same threats to keep undermining your performance. Second, you have to be honest with yourself, recognizing and acknowledging that which most threatens you. It has to be disclosed to someone you trust. It can't continue to remain a secret. Third, you need to cultivate the two qualities we talked about earlier that are fundamental to one's capacity to perform—discipline and risk—and then you need to know how and where to apply these qualities most effectively in reframing threats into challenges. Discipline and risk, when applied directly to living one's life for the challenge, have a way of offsetting the threats that tend to compromise our capacity to perform. Ask and answer the following questions: Do you have the capacity to see the challenge in any situation in which you feel threatened? Do you have the discipline to prepare for and stay focused on the challenge? Are you willing to risk predictability in pursuit of the challenge? If the challenge itself becomes your truth in any endeavor, can you really be threatened? Risk waking up to see your world for what it truly is—a playing field of limitless challenges designed for your personal edification and enlightenment. That being the case, and it is, what threat, if any, awaits you? Only one. Not playing the game. Conclusion Herein concludes our coaching session, but on Monday you start a new game. The good news is your attitude, imagination, and ability to see challenges where previously you saw only threats has been sharpened significantly during your time at Kenyon. David Brooks, in a recent New York Times column, suggests that high performing individuals "begin with two beliefs: (1) the future can be better than the present, and (2) I have the power to make it so." When you leave the Hill this weekend accept the challenge of starting over, attempt to perform well in some capacity, and, if you are successful in becoming a somebody at something (and many of you will), I would offer you the following advice Jon Stewart gave his audience at a show in Columbus a few weeks ago: "Be proud of who you are, but don't wield it as a club." Thank you very much for inviting me to speak to you today.
I abhor the term “mental toughness” and all the implications and baggage that comes with it. It is not part of my coaching vocabulary or practice. I want to help my athletes be mentally strong and understand why they are doing what they are doing. There are tough workouts and there are easy workouts all directed toward one goal: Preparing a robust adaptable athlete who is ready to thrive in the competitive arena. That requires mindful highly focused training that is done with intent and purpose. It means that the athlete has be there in mind and body every day with a clear focus on the task at hand. No puke workouts or punishment training because that is the fastest way to get the athlete to turn off their brain. Every workout demands intense concentration, so much so that the competition is easy. Be a coach and be a professional and help your athlete get better by guiding them and respecting them!
This piece is a must read for all those interested in coaching athletes. thttp://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/the-unregulated-world-of-strength-coaches-and-college-footballs-killing-season/ Let me preface this post by stating that this is not an impulsive post in reaction to this article. (More extensive discussion of this will be on tomorrows GAINcast, to down load and listen go to http://www.hmmrmedia.com/gaincast/ )The issues raised have been a concern of mine for close to thirty years. The article brought to the fore some huge issues facing us today at the high school and collegiate level regarding the lack of professional training and control over what has been traditionally called strength and conditioning. This article underscores and exposes glaring deficiencies in the system. Let me state my bias and point of view up front – I abhor the name/label of strength coach. It is a very limiting title and is a term and a concept from a bygone area when it was just about getting football players big and strong in the weight room but the name goes to the heart of the issue. The article makes a big issue of certification, once again I will state my point of view upfront. Certification is not the answer. Certification does not equal qualification. Each of the certifications that are considered gold standard are seriously flawed. The two spokespersons for the CSCS Boyd Epley and Jay Hoffman have huge biases, vested interests as well as conflict of interest. The collegiate Strength Coaches is an organization founded by strength coaches (primarily football) who felt their voice was not being heard by NSCA. The name of the organization tells all “Collegiate Strength Coaches.” To earn the label “master strength coach” means nothing more than you have been coaching 12 years. After 12 years of coaching I had no idea yet what I didn’t know. We need an organization whose mission is to define a profession with certification only one aspect of that. It is 2017 and we have “strength coaches” hurting players in football and imposing a football program on other sports. Where are we going and what are we doing? These organizations have not served us well. I am concerned as a professional who works in this field having come from a sport coaching background in track & field where I did everything necessary to prepare the athlete for competition with strength training a small part of much bigger picture. Here is an email I received this week from a college swim coach that is typical of what is going on. I receive at least one of these a week in the form of emails or phone calls from swim coaches, tennis coaches, track & field coaches. “We have a strength and conditioning coach that does one program for all sports. I believe it is mainly designed for football as that is the team that he mainly works with. In my opinion, Swimmers and Divers are a different breed of athlete and although there might be similarities to what we are doing now, I think that we might be missing out on a more sport specific quality workout. The other issue is that my athletes are not buying into the workout currently "designed" for them.” The so-called professional organizations in my opinion have chosen to ignore this problem. What can we do? I propose that we have a meeting of the minds to put all the issues on the table and seek viable solutions. I would be willing to organize and host this. I have no vested interested as I am not certified by anyone or anybody in strength and conditioning area nor do I intent to found a rival organization or certification program. I also propose we eliminate the term “strength coach “and come up with a title/name that clearly defines what should be done. Lest we forget that words create images and images create action. We must take positive constructive action now for the welfare of the athletes. For more in-depth discussion on this listen to tomorrows GAINcast, to down load and listen go to http://www.hmmrmedia.com/gaincast/
Anyone who knows me or has regularly read this blog or followed me on social media knows that I am vehemently anti-drug. So, it may seem strange to have a post on a primer for drug use and how to beat the system but I think this will give you context for looking at the issue. This is what I have seen up close and personal in my 48 years of coaching how athletes and coaches beat the system. Read the following books (Be sure to read between the lines), they will give you deep insights in how to beat the system: Wheelmen – Lance Armstrong, The Tour De France, And the Greatest Sports Conspiracy Ever by Reed Albergotti and Vanessa O’ Connell The Secret Race – Inside the Hidden World Of The Tour De France by Tyler Hamilton and Daniel Coyle Watch this movie to learn how to lie to the cameras and your accusers (Listen carefully to what is not said): The Armstrong Lie (https://youtu.be/0a4qRHY8dQQ) Practical Tips: Your national governing body for sure and preferably the international governing body should be complicit. They can protect you. Have big time sponsor with deep pockets. It is even better if the sponsor is in bed with the national governing body and those in the international federation Have a doctor and sport scientist that can help you with prescriptions and testing to beat the system – This is essential Have remote training “altitude” training camps that allow for time to stall the testers or to evade them completely Have no moral conscience or scruples of any kind, don’t forget it is just about winning, medals and above all money, big money
Olympic lifting is a sport. That sport consists of lifting as much weight as possible in the clean and jerk and the snatch. Those lifts have a high technical demand, but the skill is a closed skill that occurs in one plane through a narrow range of movement. The Olympic lifting movements do produce tremendous power production because of the distance the weight must travel, the weight and the speed requirements. This power production is highly dependent on the technical proficiency of the individual lifter. Essentially, the training of the weight lifter consists of the actual Olympic lifts and some derivative and assistance exercises. There is no running, jumping or other demands on their system. The sole focus is on lifting as much weight as possible. Olympic lifters traditionally have lifted several times a day. This trend began in the 1980s because of the influence of the Bulgarians who emerged as a dominant power in the 1970s. The Bulgarian weightlifters were reported to have had as many as six lifting sessions in a training day, repeated for up to five or six training days in a microcycle. Each session seldom ever exceeded sixty minutes. All sessions were at very high intensity. All these athletes did was lift, they were not lifting in preparation for a sport. Perhaps the most important underlying factor that enabled them to accomplish this severe training regimen was a program of systematic doping. We know that was a huge factor in the lifters ability to recover and handle the volumes of high intensity work necessary to make the type of strength gains these lifters were making. It also should be pointed out that on the international scene Olympic weightlifting is the “dirtiest” sport in terms of positive drug tests. The reason for pointing all this out is not to be negative or denigrate the sport; rather it is to put the emphasis on Olympic lifting in perspective. Too many coaches blindly copy the methods of the Olympic lifters without taking these things into consideration. Even if you are an Olympic lifting coach the volumes and intensities reported from the former Eastern bloc countries are beyond anything a drug free athlete can possibly handle for any significant length of time. Let’s take this a step further. It is very popular among the strength coaching community especially in American football to center their strength training program on Olympic lifting. Many of the football strength coaches continue to blindly copy the volumes and intensities of the Bulgarian and Soviet lifters without considering the previously mentioned facts. This volume and intensity is being applied in addition to the running, agility work, jumping and the sport specific training. It should be easy to see the problems that would arise. Classical Olympic lifts are very technical in their demands. Typically, in an athletic development setting work the lifting sessions are sequenced after their other work. This is not optimum time to utilize lifts with a significant technical element and high neural demand, because fatigue will compromise technique. The other factor that must be considered when extrapolating from the world of Olympic weightlifting is body proportions. Olympic lifters, in effect, are pre-selected by their body types. Tall athletes with long limbs are quickly selected out. Smaller athletes with limb lengths that afford a lever advantage succeed. Therefore, to apply Olympic lifting movements without taking into consideration body proportions can severely compromise the effectiveness of the methods. I have seen back injuries occur in tall basketball players and offensive linemen who were required to perform various Olympic lifting movements without modifying the movements for their body proportions. Another argument given for the use of the Olympic lifting movements is that they help with jumping because in biomechanical analysis of Olympic lifting the pattern of force closely resembled the vertical jump. I may be missing something here, but then why not just jump with resistance. To learn and master the technical complexity of the Olympic lifting movements to improve jumping seems to be a bit of a stretch. In most situations when working with athletes there is not an infinite amount of time available for training. Therefore, I choose methods that will allow me to train the athlete to be better at their sport within the constraints of the available time. After all this would I recommend using the Olympic lifting movements? Absolutely, I advocate their use across the spectrum of sports because of their potential for power development, but the clear distinction must be made that the movements must be adapted and modified to fit the athlete. It literally must fit the athlete. Body proportions must be carefully considered. Significant modification must be made for the tall athlete. It is important to point out that the Olympic lifting movements do not have to be done with a bar. I have found that Olympic movements with dumbbells to be particularly effective. The factor of body proportions is eliminated because the dumbbell will “fit the body.” The disadvantage of the dumbbell is that you will eventually be limited in the amount of weight that can be lifted so that if you are working with sports that require strength dominated power like football or the throws then it is necessary to use the bar to achieve heavier loading. Dumbbells also allow modification of the pulling movements to be done in diagonal and rotational patterns. The bar essentially locks you into the Sagittal plane. Another interesting modification of Olympic lifting movements is the use of sandbags. Sandbags not only allow you to work multiple planes, but they can be thrown which significantly raises power production. From a technical perspective make sure that you as a coach know and understand the technique. Master the teaching progressions. Be sure to allow time in the training program for skill acquisition before adding significant loading. Also teach and preferably train the movements in a non-fatigued state. Adapt the method to the athlete, not the athlete to the method. Remember you are not training Olympic lifters; you are training athletes who use the Olympic lifts and derivatives to raise explosive power.